Flight Risk Movie Review: Wahlberg, Gibson Disappoint

Trend Radar

You need 3 min read

·

Post on Jan 25, 2025

53 visitor like this post

Share

Flight Risk Movie Review: Wahlberg, Gibson Disappoint

Okay, so, I finally saw Flight Risk, and honestly? I'm kinda bummed. I went in with high expectations, you know? Mark Wahlberg and Mel Gibson? Two heavy hitters. I thought, "This is gonna be epic!" Boy, was I wrong. This ain't a glowing review, folks. Let's dive in.

The Hype vs. the Reality

The trailers promised this intense, edge-of-your-seat thriller. A desperate pilot, a ticking clock, high stakes... the works! The marketing team really played up the Wahlberg/Gibson dynamic, suggesting some kind of epic showdown. In reality? It felt… flat. Like a deflated balloon. The plot, while initially intriguing, kinda sputtered out halfway through. There were some genuinely tense moments, sure, but they were few and far between.

Wahlberg's Performance: A Missed Opportunity

Wahlberg, usually a reliable performer, felt…underused. His character lacked depth. He felt more like a cardboard cutout than a believable, flawed human being. I mean, come on, the guy's a pro. He usually brings it! This time, I just didn't feel anything. It was a real letdown. I kept waiting for that moment where he'd really shine, but it never came.

Gibson's Role: Underwhelming

And Mel Gibson? Don't get me started. His character was, frankly, underdeveloped. It felt like a wasted opportunity to showcase his incredible acting talent. He had a few good lines, don't get me wrong, but his character arc just didn't have the impact it should have had. It felt… rushed, like they needed to get him out of the scene ASAP.

Where the Movie Went Wrong: Plot Holes & Pacing

The pacing was all over the place. Some scenes dragged on forever, while others felt rushed and unexplained. Seriously, there were so many plot holes, it felt like Swiss cheese! I found myself constantly questioning the logic of the events unfolding onscreen. This wasn't just a minor issue, either. It was enough to throw the entire narrative off balance. I kept thinking, "Wait, what just happened? How did THAT happen?"

It's like they had this great idea for a movie, but they didn't quite know how to execute it. They got caught up in unnecessary subplots, leaving the main storyline feeling incomplete and unsatisfying.

The Good (Because There Was Some)

Look, it wasn't all bad. The cinematography was pretty stunning, especially the aerial shots. Wow! The visuals were breathtaking, I'll give them that. The action sequences, though few and far between, were well-executed. They were exciting and kept me on the edge of my seat for short bursts. But these good points weren't nearly enough to compensate for the shortcomings.

My Verdict: Skip It

Unless you're a die-hard fan of Wahlberg or Gibson, I'd recommend skipping Flight Risk. It's not a total waste of time – the visuals are pretty great – but there are so many better films out there worthy of your time and money. I'm giving it a generous 2 out of 5 stars. Let's be honest, I expected better. Much, much better. Maybe I had too high of expectations. Live and learn, I guess.

Keywords: Flight Risk, Movie Review, Mark Wahlberg, Mel Gibson, Thriller, Action, Plot Holes, Pacing, Cinematography, Movie Recommendation